Re: [PING] [PATCH 00/11] Regset rework preparations part 1

[Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On 05/21/2014 12:38 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 08:32 AM, Andreas Arnez wrote:
>> On Thu, May 15 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote:
>>
>>> This is the first half of the "regset rework preparations" series I've
>>> posted as RFC:
>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html
>>
>> On Wed, May 14 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>
>>>> From: Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:13:26 +0200
>>>>
>>>> Although there was feedback for some of the patches in this series
>>>> (https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html), many are
>>>> still uncommented.  I'd really appreciate more feedback, particularly
>>>> for the architecture-specific changes.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I've not been able to find time to process your reply on my
>>> review of patch 12 yet and won't be able to for the next 1.5 weeks or
>>> so.  But perhaps you could move ahead with the diffs that don't depend
>>> on that one which seem useful in their own right.
>>>
>>>> Patches 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 (AARCH64, ARM, MIPS, MN10300, and SCORE): No
>>>> comments yet.
>>>>
>>>>> * Patch 9 ("SPARC: Rename register maps from "*regset" to "*regmap"):
>>>>>   Adjusts naming, to avoid name clashes in patch 10.
>>>>
>>>> Approved by Mark Kettenis:
>>>> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00038.html
>>>
>>> I don't really expect any response for MN10300 and SCORE.  I'd give it
>>> a few days to give people with an interest in ARM and MIPS the
>>> opportunity to repsond, but feel free to move ahead with 3, 4, 6, 7
>>> and 8 after that.
>>
>> As suggested, I've waited a few additional days now for comments on
>> patches 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8.  Apart from those I believe everything else
>> in this series was approved already.
>>
>> OK to push?
>>
> 
> I've read the series, and it all looked fine to me.
> 
> Please push.
> 

Done. Thanks!

-Andreas-