From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7714 invoked by alias); 15 May 2014 17:53:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7702 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2014 17:53:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 May 2014 17:53:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4FHrJco001400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 May 2014 13:53:19 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4FHrHpp006964; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:53:18 -0400 Message-ID: <5374FF0D.6060608@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 17:53:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hui Zhu , gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix ptype.exp fail in MIPS References: <53719B17.5000208@mentor.com> In-Reply-To: <53719B17.5000208@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00253.txt.bz2 On 05/13/2014 05:09 AM, Hui Zhu wrote: > ptype $pc > type = int32_t > (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/ptype.exp: ptype $pc > This is because the $pc register in MIPS is set to int but not code_ptr. > And according to the discussion in > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2013-06/msg00020.html, the type cannot be > changed. Hmm, that's not what I get from this branch of the discussion: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2013-06/msg00021.html -- Pedro Alves