From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
To: Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4][REPOST] Remote Linux ptrace exec events
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 20:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536A9100.4080502@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1398885482-8449-3-git-send-email-donb@codesourcery.com>
Hi,
On 04/30/2014 04:18 PM, Don Breazeal wrote:
> From: Don Breazeal <don_breazeal@mentor.com>
>
> [Reposting to eliminate unexpected attachment type.]
>
> This patch implements support for exec events in gdbserver on linux, in
> multiprocess mode (target extended-remote). Follow-exec-mode and rerun
> behave as expected. Catchpoints for exec are not yet implemented since it
> will be easier to implement catchpoints for fork, vfork, and exec all at
> the same time.
>
> TESTING
> ---------
> The patch was tested on GNU/Linux x86_64 with --target_board set to
> native-gdbserver and native-extended-gdbserver, as well as testing native
> GDB. The test results for native-gdbserver were unchanged. Thirteen tests
> that used to fail for native-extended-gdbserver on Linux pass with this
> patch, and the non-ldr-exc-*.exp tests all pass in non-stop mode and
> extended-remote. There are several failures in the new non-ldr-exc-*.exp
> tests in non-stop mode with native GDB.
>
> One caveat: when an exec is detected, gdbserver emits a couple of warnings:
> gdbserver: unexpected r_debug version 0
> gdbserver: unexpected r_debug version 0
> However, debugging of shared libraries that are loaded by the exec'd
> program works just fine. These messages may be caused by gdbserver making
> an attempt to initialize the solib hook before the r_debug structure has
> been initialized. I intend to follow up in a subsequent patch.
>
> IMPLEMENTATION
> ----------------
> Support for exec events in single-threaded programs was a fairly
> straightforward replication of the implementation in native GDB:
> 1) Enable exec events via ptrace options.
> 2) Add support for handling the exec events to the handle_extended_wait
> and linux_wait_for_event_filtered. Detect the exec event, then
> find and save the pathname of the executable file being exec'd.
> 3) Implement an additional "stop reason", "exec", in the RSP stop reply
> packet "T".
> Existing GDB code takes care of handling the exec event on the host side
> without modification.
>
> Support for exec events in multi-threaded programs required some additional
> work that required a couple of significant changes to existing code. In a
> nutshell, the changes are to:
> 4) Use the PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT extended event to handle thread exit,
> while not exposing any change in exit handling to the user. The
> rationale for this is discussed in the "patch 0" email of this
> series.
> 5) Recognize when the exec'ing thread has vanished (become the thread
> group leader) in send_sigstop. Native GDB does this differently.
>
> Regarding items 4 & 5: Recall that when a non-leader thread exec's, all the
> other threads are terminated and the exec'ing thread changes its thread id
> to that of the old leader (the process id) as part of the exec. There is
> no event reported for the "exit" of the exec'ing thread; it appears to have
> vanished. The original thread group leader can't be reaped until all the
> other threads have been reaped, and some way of determining that it has
> exited is required in order to update the lwp list (#4 above). Also, some
> mechanism for deleting the lwp entry corresponding to the exec'ing thread
> is needed (#5 above).
>
> The rationale for #4 is that in my testing I ran into a race condition in
> the mechanism that's intended to detect when a thread group leader has
> exited, check_zombie_leaders. The race occurred when there were only two
> threads in the program. In this case the leader thread passes through a
> very brief zombie state before being replaced by the exec'ing thread as
> the thread group leader. This state transition is asynchronous, with no
> dependency on anything gdbserver does. Using PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT ensures
> that the leader exit will be detected. I can provide a more detailed
> explanation or the race, but I didn't want to be too long-winded here.
>
> Regarding item #5, determining that the exec'ing thread has "vanished", In
> native GDB this is done by calling waitpid(PID), and if it returns ECHILD
> it means that the thread is gone. We don't want to use waitpid(PID) in
> gdbserver, based on the discussion in
> https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-02/msg00828.html. An
> alternative is to send a signal to each thread and look for an ESRCH (No
> such process) error. In all-stop mode this can be done in the normal
> course of events, since when gdbserver reports an exec event it stops all
> the other threads with a SIGSTOP. In non-stop mode, when an exec event has
> been detected, we can call stop_all_lwps/unstop_all_lwps to accomplish the
> same thing.
>
> gdb/
> 2014-04-02 Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>
>
> * common/linux-ptrace.c (linux_test_for_tracefork)
> [GDBSERVER]: Add exec tracing to ptrace options if OS supports
> it.
> * remote.c (remote_parse_stop_reply): Support new RSP stop
> reply reason 'exec'.
>
> gdbserver/
> 2014-04-02 Don Breazeal <donb@codesourcery.com>
>
> * gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c (linux_child_pid_to_exec_file): New
> function.
> (handle_extended_wait): Add support for PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC.
> (check_zombie_leaders): Update comment.
> (linux_low_filter_event): Add support for PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC.
> (linux_wait_for_event_filtered): Update comment.
> (extended_event_reported): New function.
> (send_sigstop): Delete lwp on 'No such process' error and
> reset current_inferior.
> * gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.h (struct lwp_info): New member
> 'waitstatus'.
> * gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c (prepare_resume_reply): Support
> new RSP stop reply reason 'exec'.
>
> ---
> gdb/common/linux-ptrace.c | 7 +-
> gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c | 175 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.h | 5 +
> gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c | 28 +++++++-
> gdb/remote.c | 27 ++++++-
> 5 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/common/linux-ptrace.c b/gdb/common/linux-ptrace.c
> index e3fc705..b137df9 100644
> --- a/gdb/common/linux-ptrace.c
> +++ b/gdb/common/linux-ptrace.c
> @@ -491,8 +491,11 @@ linux_test_for_tracefork (int child_pid)
> if (ret == child_pid && WIFSTOPPED (status)
> && status >> 16 == PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT)
> {
> - /* PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT is supported. */
> - current_ptrace_options |= PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT;
> + /* PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT is supported. We use exit events to
> + implement support for exec events. Since fork events are
> + supported we know exec events are supported, so we enable
> + exec events here. */
> + current_ptrace_options |= PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT | PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC;
> }
> #endif
> }
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> index 90e7b15..5f94490 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
> @@ -281,6 +281,32 @@ static int linux_event_pipe[2] = { -1, -1 };
> static void send_sigstop (struct lwp_info *lwp);
> static void wait_for_sigstop (void);
>
> +/* Accepts an integer PID. Returns a string containing the
> + name of the executable file for the child process.
> + Space for the result is malloc'd, caller must free. */
> +
> +static char *
> +linux_child_pid_to_exec_file (int pid)
> +{
> + char *name1, *name2;
> +
> + name1 = xmalloc (PATH_MAX);
> + name2 = xmalloc (PATH_MAX);
> + memset (name2, 0, PATH_MAX);
> +
> + sprintf (name1, "/proc/%d/exe", pid);
> + if (readlink (name1, name2, PATH_MAX) > 0)
> + {
> + free (name1);
> + return name2;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + free (name2);
> + return name1;
> + }
> +}
> +
At one point in time this function existed in gdbserver/linux-low.c but
got deleted by the following commit:
commit be07f1a20c962deb662b93209b4ca91bc8e5cbd8
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Jan 27 19:23:43 2012 +0000
2012-01-27 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* linux-low.c (linux_child_pid_to_exec_file): Delete.
(elf_64_file_p): Make static.
(linux_pid_exe_is_elf_64_file): New.
* linux-low.h (linux_child_pid_to_exec_file, elf_64_file_p):
Delete declarations.
(linux_pid_exe_is_elf_64_file): Declare.
* linux-x86-low.c (x86_arch_setup): Use
linux_pid_exe_is_elf_64_file.
It still exists in linux-nat.c though. I remember i tried to unify those
and move the resulting function to common/, but there may be differences
preventing such move.
If it can be done, it would be best.
> /* Return non-zero if HEADER is a 64-bit ELF file. */
>
> static int
> @@ -514,6 +540,19 @@ handle_extended_wait (struct lwp_info *event_child, int *wstatp)
> (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG4) 0);
> return ret;
> }
> + else if (event == PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC)
> + {
> + if (debug_threads)
> + debug_printf ("LHEW: Got exec event from LWP %ld\n",
> + lwpid_of (event_thr));
> +
> + event_child->waitstatus.kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD;
> + event_child->waitstatus.value.execd_pathname
> + = linux_child_pid_to_exec_file (lwpid_of (event_thr));
> +
> + /* Report the event. */
> + return 0;
> + }
> internal_error (__FILE__, __LINE__,
> _("unknown ptrace event %d"), event);
> }
> @@ -1376,18 +1415,19 @@ check_zombie_leaders (void)
> program). In the latter case, we can't waitpid the
> leader's exit status until all other threads are gone.
>
> - - There are 3 or more threads in the group, and a thread
> + - There are multiple threads in the group, and a thread
> other than the leader exec'd. On an exec, the Linux
> kernel destroys all other threads (except the execing
> one) in the thread group, and resets the execing thread's
> tid to the tgid. No exit notification is sent for the
> execing thread -- from the ptracer's perspective, it
> appears as though the execing thread just vanishes.
> - Until we reap all other threads except the leader and the
> - execing thread, the leader will be zombie, and the
> - execing thread will be in `D (disc sleep)'. As soon as
> - all other threads are reaped, the execing thread changes
> - it's tid to the tgid, and the previous (zombie) leader
> + Until we reap all other threads (if any) except the
> + leader and the execing thread, the leader will be zombie,
> + and the execing thread will be in `D (disc sleep)'. As
> + soon as all other threads are reaped, or have reported
> + PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT events, the execing thread changes its
> + tid to the tgid, and the previous (zombie) leader
> vanishes, giving place to the "new" leader. We could try
> distinguishing the exit and exec cases, by waiting once
> more, and seeing if something comes out, but it doesn't
> @@ -1395,7 +1435,11 @@ check_zombie_leaders (void)
> we'll re-add the new one once we see the exec event
> (which is just the same as what would happen if the
> previous leader did exit voluntarily before some other
> - thread execs). */
> + thread execs).
> +
> + Note that when PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC is supported, we use
> + that mechanism to detect thread exit, including the
> + exit of zombie leaders. */
>
> if (debug_threads)
> fprintf (stderr,
> @@ -1791,6 +1835,57 @@ linux_low_filter_event (ptid_t filter_ptid, int lwpid, int *wstatp)
>
> child = find_lwp_pid (pid_to_ptid (lwpid));
>
> + /* Check for stop events reported by a process we didn't already
> + know about - anything not already in our LWP list.
> +
> + If we're expecting to receive stopped processes after
> + fork, vfork, and clone events, then we'll just add the
> + new one to our list and go back to waiting for the event
> + to be reported - the stopped process might be returned
> + from waitpid before or after the event is.
> +
> + But note the case of a non-leader thread exec'ing after the
> + leader having exited, and gone from our lists. On an exec,
> + the Linux kernel destroys all other threads (except the execing
> + one) in the thread group, and resets the execing thread's tid
> + to the tgid. No exit notification is sent for the execing
> + thread -- from the ptracer's perspective, it appears as though
> + the execing thread just vanishes. When they are available, we
> + use exit events (PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT) to detect thread exit
> + reliably. As soon as all other threads (if any) are reaped or
> + have reported their PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT events, the execing
> + thread changes it's tid to the tgid, and the previous (zombie)
> + leader vanishes, giving place to the "new" leader. The lwp
> + entry for the previous leader is deleted when we handle its
> + exit event, and we re-add the new one here. */
> +
> + if (WIFSTOPPED (wstat) && child == NULL
> + && (WSTOPSIG (wstat) == SIGTRAP && wstat >> 16 == PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC))
> + {
> + ptid_t child_ptid;
> +
It would be nice to replace the shift operation with a predicate to test
for PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC, just like you did for PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT.
> + /* A multi-thread exec after we had seen the leader exiting. */
> + if (debug_threads)
> + debug_printf ("LLW: Re-adding thread group leader LWP %d.\n",
> + lwpid);
> +
> + child_ptid = ptid_build (lwpid, lwpid, 0);
> + child = add_lwp (child_ptid);
> + child->stopped = 1;
> + current_inferior = child->thread;
> +
> + if (non_stop && stopping_threads == NOT_STOPPING_THREADS)
> + {
> + /* Make sure we delete the lwp entry for the exec'ing thread,
> + which will have vanished. We do this by sending a signal
> + to all the other threads in the lwp list, deleting any
> + that are not found. Note that in all-stop mode this will
> + happen before reporting the event. */
> + stop_all_lwps (0, child);
> + unstop_all_lwps (0, child);
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* If we didn't find a process, one of two things presumably happened:
> - A process we started and then detached from has exited. Ignore it.
> - A process we are controlling has forked and the new child's stop
> @@ -2122,8 +2217,7 @@ linux_wait_for_event_filtered (ptid_t wait_ptid, ptid_t filter_ptid,
> - When a non-leader thread execs, that thread just vanishes
> without reporting an exit (so we'd hang if we waited for it
> explicitly in that case). The exec event is reported to
> - the TGID pid (although we don't currently enable exec
> - events). */
> + the TGID pid. */
> errno = 0;
> ret = my_waitpid (-1, wstatp, options | WNOHANG);
>
> @@ -2520,6 +2614,21 @@ linux_stabilize_threads (void)
> }
> }
>
> +/* Return non-zero if WAITSTATUS reflects an extended linux
> + event. Otherwise, return 0. Note that extended EXIT
> + events are fixed up and handled like normal events, so
> + they are not considered here. */
> +
> +static int
> +extended_event_reported (const struct target_waitstatus *waitstatus)
> +{
> +
> + if (waitstatus == NULL)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return waitstatus->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD;
> +}
> +
Someone mentioned putting ()'s around the condition for better
readability. Though not required, i also agree that it improves things.
Not a requirement, just a suggestion.
> /* Wait for process, returns status. */
>
> static ptid_t
> @@ -2883,7 +2992,8 @@ retry:
> && !bp_explains_trap && !trace_event)
> || (gdb_breakpoint_here (event_child->stop_pc)
> && gdb_condition_true_at_breakpoint (event_child->stop_pc)
> - && gdb_no_commands_at_breakpoint (event_child->stop_pc)));
> + && gdb_no_commands_at_breakpoint (event_child->stop_pc))
> + || extended_event_reported (&event_child->waitstatus));
>
> run_breakpoint_commands (event_child->stop_pc);
>
> @@ -2905,6 +3015,15 @@ retry:
> paddress (event_child->stop_pc),
> paddress (event_child->step_range_start),
> paddress (event_child->step_range_end));
> + if (debug_threads
> + && extended_event_reported (&event_child->waitstatus))
> + {
> + char *str = target_waitstatus_to_string (ourstatus);
> + debug_printf ("LWP %ld has forked, cloned, vforked or execd"
> + " with waitstatus %s\n",
> + lwpid_of (get_lwp_thread (event_child)), str);
> + xfree (str);
> + }
> }
>
Maybe we could provide more precise information about the event here
instead of something generic? It may help debugging in the future or if
we ever have a mix of these events happening very close to each other.
> /* We're not reporting this breakpoint to GDB, so apply the
> @@ -3003,7 +3122,19 @@ retry:
> unstop_all_lwps (1, event_child);
> }
>
> - ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
> + if (extended_event_reported (&event_child->waitstatus))
> + {
> + /* If the reported event is a fork, vfork or exec, let GDB
> + know. */
> + ourstatus->kind = event_child->waitstatus.kind;
> + ourstatus->value = event_child->waitstatus.value;
> +
> + /* Reset the event child's waitstatus since we handled it
> + already. */
> + event_child->waitstatus.kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE;
> + }
> + else
> + ourstatus->kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED;
>
This chunk of code setting waitstatus.kind to TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE may
be a bit confusing/hackish, but we really don't want gdbserver's event
loop to handle the extended events as TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED.
gdbserver's event loop could probably use a cleanup . For the time
being, this looks good to me though.
> if (current_inferior->last_resume_kind == resume_stop
> && WSTOPSIG (w) == SIGSTOP)
> @@ -3014,13 +3145,14 @@ retry:
> ourstatus->value.sig = GDB_SIGNAL_0;
> }
> else if (current_inferior->last_resume_kind == resume_stop
> - && WSTOPSIG (w) != SIGSTOP)
> + && WSTOPSIG (w) != SIGSTOP
> + && !extended_event_reported (ourstatus))
> {
> /* A thread that has been requested to stop by GDB with vCont;t,
> but, it stopped for other reasons. */
> ourstatus->value.sig = gdb_signal_from_host (WSTOPSIG (w));
> }
> - else
> + else if (ourstatus->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED)
> {
> ourstatus->value.sig = gdb_signal_from_host (WSTOPSIG (w));
> }
> @@ -3126,6 +3258,7 @@ static void
> send_sigstop (struct lwp_info *lwp)
> {
> int pid;
> + int ret;
>
> pid = lwpid_of (get_lwp_thread (lwp));
>
> @@ -3143,7 +3276,21 @@ send_sigstop (struct lwp_info *lwp)
> debug_printf ("Sending sigstop to lwp %d\n", pid);
>
> lwp->stop_expected = 1;
> - kill_lwp (pid, SIGSTOP);
> + errno = 0;
> + ret = kill_lwp (pid, SIGSTOP);
> + if (ret == -1 && errno == ESRCH)
> + {
> + /* If the kill fails with "No such process", on GNU/Linux we know
> + that the LWP has vanished - it is not a zombie, it is gone.
> + This is due to a thread other than the thread group leader
> + calling exec. See comments in linux_low_filter_event regarding
> + PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC. */
> + delete_lwp (lwp);
> + set_desired_inferior (0);
> +
> + if (debug_threads)
> + debug_printf ("send_sigstop: lwp %d has vanished\n", pid);
> + }
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.h b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.h
> index 7459710..7759f01 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.h
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.h
> @@ -265,6 +265,11 @@ struct lwp_info
> /* When stopped is set, the last wait status recorded for this lwp. */
> int last_status;
>
> + /* If WAITSTATUS->KIND != TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE, the waitstatus for
> + this LWP's last event. This may correspond to LAST_STATUS above,
> + or to the current status during event processing. */
> + struct target_waitstatus waitstatus;
> +
> /* When stopped is set, this is where the lwp stopped, with
> decr_pc_after_break already accounted for. */
> CORE_ADDR stop_pc;
> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c b/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c
> index 4fcafa0..9ce25dc 100644
> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c
> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/remote-utils.c
> @@ -1111,14 +1111,40 @@ prepare_resume_reply (char *buf, ptid_t ptid,
> switch (status->kind)
> {
> case TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED:
> + case TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD:
> {
> struct thread_info *saved_inferior;
> const char **regp;
> struct regcache *regcache;
> + enum gdb_signal signal;
> +
> + if (status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD)
> + signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP;
> + else
> + signal = status->value.sig;
> +
> + sprintf (buf, "T%02x", signal);
>
> - sprintf (buf, "T%02x", status->value.sig);
> buf += strlen (buf);
>
> + if (status->kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD && multi_process)
> + {
> + const char *event = "exec";
> + char hexified_pathname[PATH_MAX];
> +
> + sprintf (buf, "%s:", event);
> + buf += strlen (buf);
> +
> + /* Encode pathname to hexified format. */
> + bin2hex ((const gdb_byte *) status->value.execd_pathname,
> + hexified_pathname, strlen(status->value.execd_pathname));
> +
> + sprintf (buf, "%s;", hexified_pathname);
> + xfree (status->value.execd_pathname);
> + status->value.execd_pathname = NULL;
> + buf += strlen (buf);
> + }
> +
> saved_inferior = current_inferior;
>
> current_inferior = find_thread_ptid (ptid);
> diff --git a/gdb/remote.c b/gdb/remote.c
> index be8c423..f4412d8 100644
> --- a/gdb/remote.c
> +++ b/gdb/remote.c
> @@ -5542,11 +5542,13 @@ remote_parse_stop_reply (char *buf, struct stop_reply *event)
> pnum and set p1 to point to the character following it.
> Otherwise p1 points to p. */
>
> - /* If this packet is an awatch packet, don't parse the 'a'
> - as a register number. */
> + /* If this packet has a stop reason string that starts
> + with a character that could be a hex digit, don't parse
> + it as a register number. */
>
> if (strncmp (p, "awatch", strlen("awatch")) != 0
> - && strncmp (p, "core", strlen ("core") != 0))
> + && strncmp (p, "core", strlen ("core") != 0)
> + && strncmp (p, "exec", strlen ("exec") != 0))
> {
> /* Read the ``P'' register number. */
> pnum = strtol (p, &p_temp, 16);
> @@ -5598,6 +5600,25 @@ Packet: '%s'\n"),
> p = unpack_varlen_hex (++p1, &c);
> event->core = c;
> }
> + else if (strncmp (p, "exec", p1 - p) == 0)
> + {
> + ULONGEST pid;
> + char pathname[PATH_MAX];
> +
> + p = unpack_varlen_hex (++p1, &pid);
> +
> + /* Save the pathname for event reporting and for
> + the next run command. */
> + hex2bin (p1, (gdb_byte *) pathname, (p - p1)/2);
> + /* Add the null terminator. */
> + pathname[(p - p1)/2] = '\0';
> + /* This is freed during event handling. */
> + event->ws.value.execd_pathname = xstrdup (pathname);
> + event->ws.kind = TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD;
> + /* Save the pathname for the next run command. */
> + xfree (remote_exec_file);
> + remote_exec_file = pathname;
> + }
> else
> {
> /* Silently skip unknown optional info. */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-07 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 19:18 [PATCH 0/0][REPOST] Exec events in gdbserver on Linux Don Breazeal
2014-04-30 19:18 ` [PATCH 2/4][REPOST] Remote Linux ptrace exec events Don Breazeal
2014-05-07 20:01 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2014-05-09 21:17 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-08 5:44 ` Yao Qi
2014-05-21 15:28 ` Tom Tromey
2014-04-30 19:18 ` [PATCH 4/4 v2][REPOST] Non-stop exec tests Don Breazeal
2014-04-30 19:18 ` [PATCH 3/4][REPOST] Document RSP support for Linux exec events Don Breazeal
2014-05-08 5:34 ` Yao Qi
2014-04-30 19:18 ` [PATCH 1/4][REPOST] Remote Linux ptrace exit events Don Breazeal
2014-05-07 19:40 ` Luis Machado
2014-05-08 5:23 ` Yao Qi
2014-05-09 21:03 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-21 15:15 ` Tom Tromey
2014-05-22 17:42 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-21 15:25 ` [PATCH 0/0][REPOST] Exec events in gdbserver on Linux Tom Tromey
2014-05-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 3/4] Document RSP support for Linux exec events Don Breazeal
2014-05-24 7:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-05-27 21:28 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-28 14:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-05-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 4/4] Non-stop exec tests Don Breazeal
2014-05-26 3:29 ` Doug Evans
2014-05-27 18:31 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 1/4 v3] Remote Linux ptrace exit events Don Breazeal
2014-05-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 0/4 v3] Exec events in gdbserver on Linux Don Breazeal
2014-05-26 4:55 ` Doug Evans
2014-05-27 18:49 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-27 21:41 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-28 18:02 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-06-05 22:06 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-06-06 12:29 ` Luis Machado
2014-06-19 15:56 ` Breazeal, Don
2014-05-23 22:49 ` [PATCH 2/4 v3] Remote Linux ptrace exec events Don Breazeal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536A9100.4080502@codesourcery.com \
--to=lgustavo@codesourcery.com \
--cc=donb@codesourcery.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox