From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3230 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2007 05:51:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 3220 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2007 05:51:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (HELO a.mail.sonic.net) (64.142.16.245) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Jun 2007 05:51:24 +0000 Received: from webmail.sonic.net (b.webmail.sonic.net [64.142.100.148]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id l5T5pJW7000426; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:51:19 -0700 Received: from 12.7.175.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user msnyder) by webmail.sonic.net with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5330.12.7.175.2.1183096279.squirrel@webmail.sonic.net> In-Reply-To: <18052.38305.461372.362123@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <5313.12.7.175.2.1183091734.squirrel@webmail.sonic.net> <18052.38305.461372.362123@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 11:34:00 -0000 Subject: Re: [resubmit] memory leak, mi-cmd-var From: msnyder@sonic.net To: "Nick Roberts" Cc: msnyder@sonic.net, gdb-patches@sourceware.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2 > The conservative approach would be to wait until after the release, or at > least the branch/branchpoint. That's perfectly reasonable -- I certainly don't object to holding these patches for after the branchpoint, and I won't check any more in as "obvious". Just let's not have them fall thru a crack... ;-) Michael