From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5623 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2014 17:11:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5569 invoked by uid 89); 17 Mar 2014 17:11:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:11:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2HHBG7r024006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:11:17 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2HHBC26000975; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:11:13 -0400 Message-ID: <53272CB0.6050101@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 17:11:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] PR breakpoints/7143 - Watchpoint does not trigger when first set References: <1394154640-14053-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1394154640-14053-3-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2 On 03/16/2014 03:41 AM, Doug Evans wrote: > Hi. Ok by me with one nit. Thanks. FAOD, are you planning on replying to the other patches in the series? >> + Presently GDB can only step over a breakpoint at any given time. > > I realize this is nitpicky, but can you reword this as: Sure thing. > > Presently GDB can only step over one breakpoint at any given time. > > I realize it's saying the same thing, but when I first read it I had > to read it a couple of times to make sure I read it right. Maybe it's > just me. I agree. -- Pedro Alves