Re: [PATCH 0/5] Return error code in get_number

Yao Qi
2014-03-17T00:51:22Z

On 03/14/2014 10:38 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> It seems to me that an MI client already knows all the breakpoint
> numbers. I'm having trouble picturing the scenario where I'd want my MI
> client to use a convenience variable instead.

This facilitates writing MI test cases that we don't have to hard-code
breakpoint numbers anymore. Keith pointed this out in the review
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-01/msg00824.html and I think
that is good to have, so I write this patch series. Can this justify
the changes in this series?

--
Yao (é½å°§)