From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7239 invoked by alias); 12 Mar 2014 11:29:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7230 invoked by uid 89); 12 Mar 2014 11:29:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:29:03 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s2CBT0CH028796 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 07:29:00 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s2CBSxjS015426; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 07:28:59 -0400 Message-ID: <532044FA.7060704@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:29:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make the windows-nat.c target inherit inf-child.c. References: <1394205292-19784-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1394205292-19784-3-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <531F3CF8.8070208@redhat.com> <20140312090656.GF4882@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20140312090656.GF4882@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00280.txt.bz2 On 03/12/2014 09:06 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Hi Pedro, > >> I wonder whether anyone with easier Windows than me wants >> to run this through the test suite? Otherwise, with the >> little Wine test I did, I'm pretty sure I didn't break >> things too much. :-) > > I ran this patch against our testsuite on Windows, and found > no regression. I think it's good :-)... Thank you! This series is now all in. -- Pedro Alves