From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17320 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2014 11:09:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17300 invoked by uid 89); 7 Mar 2014 11:09:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:09:07 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1WLseE-0007Fr-6Y from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 03:09:02 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-04.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.41]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:09:01 -0800 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-04.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:09:00 -0800 Message-ID: <5319A842.7060200@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:09:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Error on bad count number References: <1394023608-10761-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1394023608-10761-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <20140305142939.GB16858@adacore.com> <531749BA.8050806@redhat.com> <5318456D.3010709@codesourcery.com> <53186842.9030704@redhat.com> <5319938B.60402@codesourcery.com> <8338iuqnzj.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <8338iuqnzj.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00182.txt.bz2 On 03/07/2014 06:53 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > AFAIR, breakpoints set by GDB for its own purposes are given negative > numbers. Yes, the number of breakpoint for specific event, such as shlib event and thread event, is negative. These negative numbers are used by GDB internally, negative number in user input is still invalid, afaik. -- Yao (齐尧)