From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27588 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2014 09:01:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27573 invoked by uid 89); 19 Feb 2014 09:01:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:01:09 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1WG31d-0002jf-NV from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:01:05 -0800 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:01:05 -0800 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:01:04 -0800 Message-ID: <53047264.9000705@codesourcery.com> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:01:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Weigand CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR16220 References: <201402181344.s1IDitZg024525@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <201402181344.s1IDitZg024525@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 On 02/18/2014 09:44 PM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > This is OK; nice to see this finally gone! > Thanks for the quick review. Patch is pushed. > Note that after this patch, the "staticdefault" field in gdbarch.sh is now > unused; it would be best to completely remove this field as well. OK, I'll post a follow-up patch. -- Yao (齐尧)