From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25862 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2014 13:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25853 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2014 13:16:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:16:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s16DFv3Y030704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:15:58 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s16DFtei015213; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 08:15:55 -0500 Message-ID: <52F38B0A.9090506@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:16:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdbreplay not installed References: <83d2j0z9pf.fsf@gnu.org> <52F38692.2000404@redhat.com> <83bnykz8yg.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83bnykz8yg.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00089.txt.bz2 On 02/06/2014 01:06 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:56:50 +0000 >> From: Pedro Alves >> CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> >> On 02/06/2014 12:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> I noticed that gdbreplay is built, but not installed by "make >>> install". Is that on purpose? >> >> Yeah, it's always been that way AFAIK. That's because that's really >> a maintainer tool, not a user tool. I don't think gdbreplay is >> even documented in the user manual? > > It is mentioned in gdbserver/README. > > If it is not for users, perhaps it shouldn't be built by the default > Make target? Personally, from a maintenance perspective, I prefer that it's always built. The tool is quite small and quick to build, and this way helps avoid potential bit rot. -- Pedro Alves