From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8495 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2014 17:51:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8482 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2014 17:51:51 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:51:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0GHpnVm006708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:51:49 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0GHpmph010142; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:51:48 -0500 Message-ID: <52D81C33.8050901@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:51:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 28/32] convert to_get_section_table References: <1389640367-5571-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1389640367-5571-29-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <52D58EB9.1030504@redhat.com> <87ha96uzus.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <52D5904D.5030702@redhat.com> <87k3e1ryaj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87k3e1ryaj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00632.txt.bz2 On 01/15/2014 04:43 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: > Tom> Yeah. Unfortunately I didn't think of this early enough. I can fix > Tom> this if you like, but unlike other rewrites, I'd prefer to do it as a > Tom> cleanup patch on top. I found the hard way that modifications to these > Tom> lines cause conflicts to bubble up through the entire patch series. > > Pedro> Yeah, please leave it as is. We can always clean up afterwards. > > I applied this patch to my branch to clean this up. Thank you. -- Pedro Alves