From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26605 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2013 19:46:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26595 invoked by uid 89); 13 Dec 2013 19:46:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:46:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rBDJkPBn029678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:46:25 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rBDJkNKJ009023; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 14:46:23 -0500 Message-ID: <52AB640F.6050201@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 19:46:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Markus Metzger CC: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch v8 22/24] btrace, gdbserver: read branch trace incrementally References: <1386839747-8860-1-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> <1386839747-8860-23-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1386839747-8860-23-git-send-email-markus.t.metzger@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00545.txt.bz2 On 12/12/2013 09:15 AM, Markus Metzger wrote: > + > + /* The instructions vector may become empty temporarily if this has > + been the only instruction in this function segment. > + This violates the invariant but will be remedied shortly. */ By what? > + return 0; > +} -- Pedro Alves