From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26686 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2013 18:58:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26666 invoked by uid 89); 28 Nov 2013 18:58:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 18:58:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rASIwP9V012152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:58:25 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rASIwNse015062; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:58:24 -0500 Message-ID: <5297924F.8010508@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 20:14:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Burgess CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Print entirely unavailable struct/union values as a single . (Re: [PATCH 06/12] Delete value_bits_valid.) References: <5208D1DF.1090201@broadcom.com> <5208D495.9080806@broadcom.com> <52939BD4.4090803@redhat.com> <52946C45.2040003@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <52946C45.2040003@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00890.txt.bz2 On 11/26/2013 09:39 AM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > On 25/11/2013 6:49 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> >> I'd like to get this part out of the way; I don't have a problem with >> it. >> >> We don't really need the whole series for this though. Any >> objections? > > Sounds reasonable to me. Thanks. Now pushed. -- Pedro Alves