From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8022 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2013 16:38:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8012 invoked by uid 89); 15 Nov 2013 16:38:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:38:33 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAFGcOud009473 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:38:24 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAFGcLX2028871; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:38:22 -0500 Message-ID: <52864DFD.7060408@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:45:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Evans CC: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Phil Muldoon , eliz@gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc RFA] Allow CLI and Python conditions to be set on same breakpoint References: <87bo1mwvqg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <52853D8A.5070908@redhat.com> <5286078F.8090700@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 On 11/15/2013 03:54 PM, Doug Evans wrote: > That's really just the "It's more useful to combine them as &&" view > (which I agree is a good point). I'm afraid I'm confused. Were you asking for something else? I can't really understand whether it was something like that you were asking for, or something else, whatever it would be. I feel something is getting lost in translation, sorry about that. :-( > Same thing can apply to other functionality implemented as a Python > breakpoint with "stop". WDYM? This sentence really confuses me. :-( What "thing"? > I can think of a couple of other ways to achieve it, but && makes it easy. -- Pedro Alves