From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4051 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2013 14:40:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4042 invoked by uid 89); 15 Nov 2013 14:40:56 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:40:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAFEekGg016991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:40:46 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAFEeiYw012055; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:40:45 -0500 Message-ID: <5286326C.8010204@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:54:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix DW_OP_GNU_regval_type with FP registers References: <1384434175-15561-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <877gcawvp9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20131115120635.GV3481@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20131115120635.GV3481@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00413.txt.bz2 On 11/15/2013 12:06 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Regarding Pedro's suggestion, what do we think of "read_addr_from_reg"? > Still not perfect, as it hides a bit the fact that it only does > a partial register read if the address size is smaller than the > register size. But much better than "read_reg", I agree. That sounds fine to me. It maps well to address_from_register. -- Pedro Alves