From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14233 invoked by alias); 30 Oct 2013 18:48:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 14221 invoked by uid 89); 30 Oct 2013 18:48:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:48:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r9UImcl1009001 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:48:39 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r9UImasW011971; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:48:37 -0400 Message-ID: <52715484.4070409@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:48:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Burgess CC: Eli Zaretskii , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extra error message from update_watchpoint References: <5260FD66.7090506@broadcom.com> <52616D4B.3020209@redhat.com> <526FE5E9.3000909@broadcom.com> <83ob68dmfb.fsf@gnu.org> <526FF27B.8090209@broadcom.com> <5270F23E.7010602@broadcom.com> <83a9hqepgt.fsf@gnu.org> <52713E2F.2030709@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <52713E2F.2030709@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00929.txt.bz2 On 10/30/2013 05:13 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > "Can't set read/access watchpoint, software read/access watchpoints not > supported, and hardware watchpoints disabled (see set/show > can-use-hw-watchpoints)." The mention of "software read/access watchpoints" seems redundant to me. IMO, the shorter: "Can't set read/access watchpoint with hardware watchpoint support disabled (see set/show can-use-hw-watchpoints)." has all the info necessary. WDYT? If that's still too long, given that version says "disabled" explicitly, then we might drop the "(see set/show can-use-hw-watchpoints)" part. (I don't see an issue with using more than one line though.) -- Pedro Alves