From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4935 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2013 01:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4925 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2013 01:05:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GARBLED_BODY autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 01:05:45 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1VWyVa-0001bv-6B from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:05:42 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:05:42 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:05:41 -0700 Message-ID: <52608919.6080701@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 01:05:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] Add annex in an async remote notification. References: <1376877311-4135-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1376877311-4135-3-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <52448041.3070703@redhat.com> <5244E2F6.6050306@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <5244E2F6.6050306@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00544.txt.bz2 On 09/27/2013 09:44 AM, Yao Qi wrote: > The ordering is the reason we add annex. As you said, events > with the same basic notification are handled in a FIFO manner. Events > with Point:created, Point:modified, and Point:deleted should be > processed in a FIFO order, while Trace:status and Trace:foo should be > processed in FIFO too. When this series was written, 2013 Jan, hui was > proposing "target-defined breakpoint", which requires some asnyc > notifications on breakpoints, so we added annex in V3. > > [PATCH 1/5] Add annex in a async remote notification. > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-01/msg00506.html > > Nowadays, we have few notifications (Stop and Trace) and each of them > are not related. As more notification added, we'll need annex in the > infrastructure, IMO. Pedro, If you think annex is unnecessary, I can remove it and recreate the patches on top of V2. -- Yao (齐尧)