From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27894 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2013 19:43:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 27881 invoked by uid 89); 9 Oct 2013 19:43:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:43:38 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r99JhanA017668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:43:37 -0400 Received: from [10.36.5.3] (vpn1-5-3.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.3]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r99JhZSU022668; Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:43:36 -0400 Message-ID: <5255B1E7.1090508@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:43:00 -0000 From: Ondrej Oprala User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Tromey CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] -Wc++-compat patches References: <1381339053-14519-1-git-send-email-ooprala@redhat.com> <877gdmb7e9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <877gdmb7e9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00318.txt.bz2 On 10/09/2013 08:56 PM, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Ondrej" == Ondrej Oprala writes: > Ondrej> I've rebased Tom's patches from the archer/tromey/c++ branch > Ondrej> and mentioned the changes in respective ChangeLogs. > > Thanks for doing that. No problem. > > Note that even after all the patches on the branch, the result still > isn't -Wc++-compat clean. More work is needed. Yes, I'm aware of this :) (which is why I didn't include the patch for configure.ac ). I plan on doing some more work in this area. > Tom Thanks, Ondrej