From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13510 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2013 14:34:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13501 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2013 14:34:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:34:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r98EYfTr000671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:34:41 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r98EYd7G001833; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 10:34:40 -0400 Message-ID: <525417FE.2030205@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:34:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Yurij Grechishhev , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/code+NEWS] new "set/show serial baud" command References: <87bo6affrh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <524ECCBB.5050307@gmail.com> <20131008035636.GC3092@adacore.com> <5253F497.6040709@redhat.com> <20131008141639.GF3092@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20131008141639.GF3092@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00224.txt.bz2 On 10/08/2013 03:16 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> I'd rather we do it right the first time. If we're a go with >>> the "set serial baud" command, I don't mind taking care of >>> that part. As Pedro hints, it's a fairly easy change to make. >>> >>> Pedro, should we go ahead? It's only been a day or two, but we haven't >>> had any objection so far. >> >> Yeah, I think so. > > Attached is a patch that implements that. > Thanks, looks good to me, though, don't we need to update the manual? -- Pedro Alves