From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7497 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2013 12:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7487 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2013 12:03:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:03:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r98C3bBP025939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:03:38 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r98C3Z14016462; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 08:03:36 -0400 Message-ID: <5253F497.6040709@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:03:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Yurij Grechishhev , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Setting parity for remote serial References: <87bo6affrh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <524ECCBB.5050307@gmail.com> <20131008035636.GC3092@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20131008035636.GC3092@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00215.txt.bz2 [tweaking subject to draw others' attention] On 10/08/2013 04:56 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> IOW, IMO, if we add "set serial parity", >>> we should also alias "set remotebaud" to "set serial baud", and whatever >>> other commands would make sense (which should be really simple to do). >> >> That would be great. But it's more comprehensive patch that I have done. >> Can we add all "set remotefoo" commands and then alias them >> to "set serial foo" at once? >> Related discussion: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2001-09/msg00358.html > > I'd rather we do it right the first time. If we're a go with > the "set serial baud" command, I don't mind taking care of > that part. As Pedro hints, it's a fairly easy change to make. > > Pedro, should we go ahead? It's only been a day or two, but we haven't > had any objection so far. Yeah, I think so. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves