From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10723 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2013 17:59:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 10712 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2013 17:59:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:59:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r94Hx21h004795 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:59:02 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r94Hx0SL026592; Fri, 4 Oct 2013 13:59:01 -0400 Message-ID: <524F01E4.7050902@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:59:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [DOC] Mention what happens when the thread of a thread-specific breakpoint is gone. References: <1380898896-16767-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <83y569apvb.fsf@gnu.org> <524F00E6.9010104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <524F00E6.9010104@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 On 10/04/2013 06:54 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > That was on purpose. It's what GDB says too. That's because > there are other ways for a thread to disappear other than > a regular thread exit, such as "detach", "disconnect" > or gdb losing the remote connection, etc. The thread hasn't > really exited in those cases. I guess that means I should update the docs to clarify that. :-) A sec while I prepare a new patch. -- Pedro Alves