From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2607 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2013 15:29:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 2598 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2013 15:29:54 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:29:54 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPAM_SUBJECT autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8RFTp4G009004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:29:51 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8RFTnDD018787; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:29:50 -0400 Message-ID: <5245A46D.6090606@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:29:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix regular /path/to/directory sysroots and target reported dll paths with drive specs. References: <1370306007-877-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <524580D8.3090409@redhat.com> <52459396.1060801@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <52459396.1060801@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00963.txt.bz2 On 09/27/2013 03:17 PM, Yao Qi wrote: > On 09/27/2013 08:58 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> This actually broke sysroots that are _not_ "remote:". >> >> Comments on the patch below? > > This patch looks right to me. Thanks for fixing it. Thanks, applied. -- Pedro Alves