From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16441 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2013 13:29:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16430 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2013 13:29:24 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:29:24 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8JDTJUF026915 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:29:19 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8JDTHYh022379; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 09:29:18 -0400 Message-ID: <523AFC2D.8050202@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 13:29:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lgustavo@codesourcery.com CC: Joel Brobecker , "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move code to common/ptid.h References: <523AEB33.9080100@codesourcery.com> <20130919123407.GQ3132@adacore.com> <523AF193.1020907@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <523AF193.1020907@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00677.txt.bz2 On 09/19/2013 01:44 PM, Luis Machado wrote: > Thanks Joel. Well, i feel the same, but this is old cruft that should > either get out of the way or get out of the code. > > As is, these are just useless constructions that keep getting in the way > of duplication removal. > > So, let's do it differently. Let's get rid of all these macros and their > uses. How does that sound? +1 -- Pedro Alves