From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21669 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2013 03:59:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21651 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2013 03:59:06 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:59:06 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8J3x0JA027077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:59:00 -0400 Received: from stumpy.slc.redhat.com (ovpn-113-163.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.163]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8J3wwYM010389; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:58:59 -0400 Message-ID: <523A7682.3020000@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 03:59:00 -0000 From: Jeff Law User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Tristan Gingold , Richard Sandiford , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Release 2.24 References: <2741C968-721F-46E9-A2BA-E4B0F64C444B@adacore.com> <20130918213245.GO3132@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20130918213245.GO3132@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00639.txt.bz2 On 09/18/2013 03:32 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> Just as a reminder, can we please coordinate so that GDB 7.7 is released >> before binutils 2.24? > > It's fine with GDB of course if the Binutils projects wants to wait > for the GDB 7.7 release, but my guess is that we are quite a ways > away from it: We need the git transition to be done first, then > we need to make the branch and stabilize it towards a release state. Speaking with my Fedora/Red Hat hat on, I'd much prefer to see binutils-2.24 move forward independent of gdb-7.7. Jeff