From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca (simark.ca [158.69.221.121]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05032385DC0A for ; Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:59:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 05032385DC0A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=simark.ca Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=simark@simark.ca Received: from [10.0.0.11] (173-246-6-90.qc.cable.ebox.net [173.246.6.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79D771E791; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:59:48 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH]: texinfo remove broken links Previous and Up from contents To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: jg@jguk.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <9a670cec-ee22-8d98-47d5-4876b9ca7c58@jguk.org> <83a71qlzf8.fsf@gnu.org> <831rmo70wx.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7vi5nz0.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Marchi Message-ID: <5229410d-e153-8c28-dbd9-d8cc5d25847b@simark.ca> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:59:48 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83h7vi5nz0.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 02:59:50 -0000 On 2020-06-10 10:35 p.m., Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org >> From: Simon Marchi >> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 19:29:47 -0400 >> >>> No, it just needs to be fixed by whoever pushes this change. >>> >> >> Eli, since you reviewed it and Jonny doesn't have push access, would you mind pushing it? > > Fine with me, but where's the final patch, please? > You said the original patch was fine with the ChangeLog entry fixed (adding a period), then said that it could be fixed by whoever pushed the patch, so I thought you could do just that. Anyway, I just fixed it and pushed the patch. Simon