From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9476 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2013 19:07:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9458 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2013 19:07:39 -0000 Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (HELO elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (209.86.89.63) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:07:39 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net Received: from [68.96.200.16] (helo=macbook2.local) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1VGvwv-0001Dn-Gk for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:07:37 -0400 Message-ID: <52263373.3080401@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 19:07:00 -0000 From: Stan Shebs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: gdb web page patch for git conversion References: <87ob8gp82d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130829205557.GA3315@adacore.com> <5224D659.2050700@redhat.com> <20130903131803.GA2809@adacore.com> <5225F5D2.3050509@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5225F5D2.3050509@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ae6f8838ff913eba0cc1426638a40ef67e972de0d01da940cf88d37c1cf7efccfcaf61ab7b48eeb7350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2 On 9/3/13 7:44 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 09/03/2013 02:18 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >>> I'm sure you've thought of that, but I'm curious. >>> Is there any hope in converting those repos away from CVS too at some >>> point? With git (or any DCVS), it sounds like savannah's could just be >>> a clone of sourceware's... >> >> I confess that I never really took any time considering the various >> options for conversion. I update the web sites so seldomly, and >> the CVS-git bridge has been working well enough, so I did not feel >> it was worth much or our time. That being said, I'd be happy to get >> rid of CVS there as well, if that was deemed important. > > Ack. I'll admit that my curiosity stems from the fact that > I've myself considered tweaking the web pages before, but never > managed to get myself over the fact that that would involve > another cvs checkout. :-) I'll admit it sounds silly for > someone who's been using cvs day in, day out. Maybe that's > just my unconscious telling me to avoid touching html. :-) > My semi-baked plan for the web site redesign, as seen at http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/WebsiteRedesign includes a git migration. Stan stan@codesourcery.com