From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12666 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2013 14:44:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12652 invoked by uid 89); 3 Sep 2013 14:44:41 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:44:41 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r83Eia0f024174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:44:37 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r83EiY6F023204; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:44:35 -0400 Message-ID: <5225F5D2.3050509@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 14:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: gdb web page patch for git conversion References: <87ob8gp82d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130829205557.GA3315@adacore.com> <5224D659.2050700@redhat.com> <20130903131803.GA2809@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20130903131803.GA2809@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On 09/03/2013 02:18 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I'm sure you've thought of that, but I'm curious. >> Is there any hope in converting those repos away from CVS too at some >> point? With git (or any DCVS), it sounds like savannah's could just be >> a clone of sourceware's... > > I confess that I never really took any time considering the various > options for conversion. I update the web sites so seldomly, and > the CVS-git bridge has been working well enough, so I did not feel > it was worth much or our time. That being said, I'd be happy to get > rid of CVS there as well, if that was deemed important. Ack. I'll admit that my curiosity stems from the fact that I've myself considered tweaking the web pages before, but never managed to get myself over the fact that that would involve another cvs checkout. :-) I'll admit it sounds silly for someone who's been using cvs day in, day out. Maybe that's just my unconscious telling me to avoid touching html. :-) -- Pedro Alves