[PATCH] gdb.base/code_elim.exp - empty bss issue.

["Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>]

The gdb.base/code_elim.exp test builds the file
gdb.base/code_elim1.c, then runs the following
gdb command:

(gdb) add-symbol-file /projects/firepath_work/aburgess/upstream-gdb-git/build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/code_elim1 0x100000 -s .bss 0x120000

If there's no .bss section then this will issue a warning.

On x86-64 Linux building the code_elim1.c file /does/ result in some
.bss content, however, non of this content comes from the code_elim1.c
source file, it's all from the libraries.

On my local embeded target, and I'm guessing possibly other targets, I
get no .bss section at all (the test is compiled -fdata-sections and
-Wl,-gc-sections), which results in the no .bss warning, and the test
failing.

I could fix this by either:

  1. Check the binary for a .bss before issuing the add-symbol-file
     command, and not including the "-s .bss <addr>" part if it's
     not needed.

  2. Extend the test regexp to allow for the warning.

  3. Force the test to generate some .bss content.

I chose option #3 but would be happy to rewrite to any of the other
options if they were prefered.

OK to apply?

Thanks,
Andrew

gdb/ChangeLog

2013-08-30  Andrew Burgess  <aburgess@broadcom.com>

	* gdb.base/code_elim1.c (my_bss_symbol): New variable added.
	(my_static_symbol): Add comment.
	(main): Reference my_bss_symbol.

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/code_elim1.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/code_elim1.c
index 3de92de..d55284a 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/code_elim1.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/code_elim1.c
@@ -17,6 +17,13 @@
 
 int my_global_symbol = 42;
 
+/* Symbol MY_BSS_SYMBOL is referenced, and should be placed into .bss
+   section.  */
+
+static int my_bss_symbol;
+
+/* Symbol MY_STATIC_SYMBOL is never referenced and so will be eliminated.  */
+
 static int my_static_symbol;
 
 int
@@ -24,7 +31,7 @@ main ()
 {
   int v_in_main;
 
-  return v_in_main;
+  return v_in_main + my_bss_symbol;
 }
 
 int