From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16777 invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2013 11:38:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16766 invoked by uid 89); 27 Aug 2013 11:38:30 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:38:30 +0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7RBcRk5020961 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:38:27 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7RBcPpr003034; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:38:26 -0400 Message-ID: <521C8FB1.4000601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:38:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joel Brobecker CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] windows-nat.c: Don't install a deprecated_xfer_memory method. References: <20130823181245.4023.25651.stgit@brno.lan> <20130823200850.GF5221@adacore.com> In-Reply-To: <20130823200850.GF5221@adacore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00778.txt.bz2 On 08/23/2013 09:08 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote: >> I'm not setup for proper Cygwin/Windows testing, but I managed to >> cross build gdb from GNU/Linux, and copy the resulting binary to a >> Windows box. Running that gdb on itself worked well enough to run to >> main, so I can't imagine any regression from this. Does anyone want >> (and is willing) to run this through the testsuite? > > I can give it a spin, but probably not before sometime next week... Thanks Joel. Yao already ran this through testing, so it won't be necessary either. -- Pedro Alves