From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: "Bunk, Bernd" <bernd.bunk@intel.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
"tromey@redhat.com" <tromey@redhat.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Added file properties to windows gdb executable for all mingw32 builds.
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521773E9.1060704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E2C54CDFBA86B845B3B075E2B2042A91202566E0@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 08/23/2013 03:05 PM, Bunk, Bernd wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pedro Alves [mailto:palves@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 9:24 PM
>> To: Eli Zaretskii
>> Cc: Bunk, Bernd; tromey@redhat.com; gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Added file properties to windows gdb executable
>> for all mingw32 builds.
>>
>> On 08/22/2013 04:09 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>
>>> The GNU project doesn't like calling Windows a "win", so I suggest to
>>> rename the files and the script to use something like mingw instead.
>>
>> I'd think this works just as well on Cygwin binaries? I suggest
>> windows-*.
> I did not implement this for Cygwin for several reasons:
>
> First I have no means to test that here and did not want to submit untested features or even break other builds.
>
> And second I detected that there is a Cygwin based build (gdbtk) that has a resource (with an icon) build and linked into a windows gdb binary. I did not want to interfere with that (again no way to test it).
>
> I could extend my implementation to all windows host builds, but TBH setting up a Cygwin environment (inside our build environment) is a huge effort that is overkill for this little feature.
>
>>
>> "properties" sounds odd to me, given files are usually called resource
>> files. IIRC, the frequent file name used in lots of projects is
>> winres.rc. But then, if you have more than one program in your
>> project, you'd go with gdbres.rc, foores.rc, etc. Which leads me to
>> ... We already have some support for including resources (icon, etc.)
>> in the binary, for gdbtk.
>> See gdb/configure.ac, gdb/Makefile.in and gdbtk/gdb.rc etc.
>> Isn't this going to conflict on gdbtk builds?
> See above, yes it would.
Well, it just looks to me that the gdbres.rc resource
and the icon are presently only used on Cygwin-hosts builds,
because nobody bothered to tweak that configure bit to make it work
on mingw-hosts too. That bit is there since at least 2000, and I
believe MinGW host support came in much after. Cygwin wanting
pretty icons, but MinGW not is kind of strange, wouldn't
you say? :-)
Do you have any hint at what one would need to do, if one
were to enable that icon resource on mingw too?
>
>>
>> While at it, follows a review of the patch.
>>
>>> +# shell parameters
>> ...
>>
>>> +
>>> +# default option values
>>> +# keep these defaults in sync with gdb/top.c print_gdb_version()
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> +# check for environment variables to replace certain file properties
>>
>> Please make the comments follow the GNU style. That is, Start
>> sentences with upper case, and end them with a double period.
> Ok, I found only one shell script in that area (common/create-version.sh) and used that as code example. But I can adapt the comment/coding style - no problem [see next update]
I don't see any comment formatting problem in create-version.sh.
(btw, I meant "double space after period". Don't know
why I wrote "double period".)
>
>>
>>> + Patch this header file using create-win_exe_properties.sh during
>> gdb build
>>> + to customize the file properties. */
>>
>> Likewise, double period. There may be more instances.
>>
>>> +# keep these defaults in sync with gdb/top.c print_gdb_version()
>> ...
>>> +copyright="Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
>>
>> That "keep in sync" comment is useless, as nobody will remember to look
>> here when looking at top.c. Instead, remove that, and you'll need to
>> update the "Start of New Year Procedure" section in the internals
>> manual. Guess that means in the wiki now, once this patch is in.
> Ok, I remove that command, but will need to investigate what exactly this means. But changing a wiki afterwards does not sound so difficult.
>
I mean this section:
http://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdbint/Start-of-New-Year-Procedure.html#Start-of-New-Year-Procedure
The internals manual has just recently all been dumped into the wiki:
http://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20Start-of-New-Year-Procedure
See "A new strategy for internals documentation" thread in gdb@.
>>
>>> +win_exe_properties.h: Makefile version.in common/create-
>> win_exe_properties.sh
>>> + $(SHELL) $(srcdir)/common/create-win_exe_properties.sh $(srcdir)
>> \
>>> + "$(host_alias)" "$(target_alias)" win_exe_properties.h
>>
>> It's better to write to a temporary file, and then move to the final
>> destination, so you don't end up with a half baked file if you cancel
>> the build at the wrong time.
> Ok, didn't think about this - good catch! So I will follow the version file approach and create a temp (header) file inside the build folder, not inside the $(srcdir) folder. [see next update]
Yes, see e.g., the copying.c rule just above the rule you added.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-23 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 8:56 Bernd Bunk
2013-08-22 15:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-22 19:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-22 19:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-23 13:06 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 13:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-23 13:42 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 14:09 ` Bunk, Bernd
2013-08-23 14:07 ` Bunk, Bernd
2013-08-23 14:38 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-08-26 12:02 ` Bunk, Bernd
2013-08-26 15:42 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-23 13:45 ` Bunk, Bernd
2013-08-23 14:20 ` asmwarrior
2013-08-23 14:56 ` Bunk, Bernd
2013-08-23 14:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-08-26 12:25 ` Bunk, Bernd
2013-08-26 15:24 ` Pedro Alves
2013-08-26 12:34 ` Bunk, Bernd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521773E9.1060704@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=bernd.bunk@intel.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox