From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3585 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2013 17:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3575 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2013 17:06:02 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:06:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7MH5x4j028011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:05:59 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7MH5wA5007215; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:05:58 -0400 Message-ID: <521644F5.5000901@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:06:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lgustavo@codesourcery.com CC: "'gdb-patches@sourceware.org'" , Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [PATCH, v2] Share ptrace options discovery/linux native code between GDB and gdbserver References: <5212A9E1.6030707@codesourcery.com> <52139BBA.60300@redhat.com> <52142F4B.7030702@codesourcery.com> <52153132.5040400@redhat.com> <52157A99.8030904@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <52157A99.8030904@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00648.txt.bz2 On 08/22/2013 03:42 AM, Luis Machado wrote: > My intention is to pursue a ptrace wrapper at a later stage, so i can > probably address this by then. OOC, for tracing ptrace calls, or something else? > How does this third iteration look? Looks great, thanks. -- Pedro Alves