From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-104534-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8631 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2013 11:22:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 8615 invoked by uid 89); 22 Aug 2013 11:22:52 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from outdoor.onevision.de (HELO outdoor.onevision.de) (212.77.172.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:22:51 +0000
Received: from sanders.onevision.de (moonrace [212.77.172.62])	by outdoor.onevision.de (8.14.3/8.13.7/ROSCH/DDB) with ESMTP id r7MBMfc0025857;	Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:22:46 +0200
Received: from [192.168.5.32] ([192.168.5.32])          by sanders.onevision.de (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3)          with ESMTP id 2013082213223640-21944 ;          Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:22:36 +0200
Message-ID: <5215F47C.8030909@onevision.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:22:00 -0000
From: Roland Schwingel <roland.schwingel@onevision.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,        "gdb-patches@sourceware.org ml" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] Windows x64 SEH unwinder (v2)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00628.txt.bz2

Hi Pedro

 > > I think I understand the issue.
 > >
 > > This is caused by DW_OP_call_frame_cfa, which is supported only by
 > > the dwarf2 unwinder.
 > > This issue has been fixed in gcc (CL date is 2012-03-15).
 >
 > It took me a bit to dig out which patch that was, to understand
 > what the issue is.  For the benefit of others, it's here:
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg00980.html

This patch is already part of the gcc 4.8 I am using and is 
unfortunately not curing the problem. I will try tristan's new patch 
soon to see whether it is working now (where I do have a lot of 
convidence in).

Roland