From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11974 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2013 13:51:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 11965 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2013 13:51:43 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:51:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7JDpdQM030907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:51:39 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JDpbi4013204; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:51:38 -0400 Message-ID: <521222E9.7000605@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:51:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lgustavo@codesourcery.com CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-nat.c: no need to block child signals so aggressively. References: <20130814182653.7136.72780.stgit@brno.lan> <520BD162.1020105@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <520BD162.1020105@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 On 08/14/2013 07:50 PM, Luis Machado wrote: > Based on the explanation, it makes sense to me. Great. I've put it in now. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves