Re: [PATCH, gdbserver] Further cleanup of FDPIC/DSBT divergences

Mike Frysinger
2013-06-24T15:50:44Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

On Thursday 20 June 2013 14:51:00 Luis Machado wrote:
> What do you think? Yao? Mike?

bloop, accidentally deleted this before i got a chance to respond :)

this looks really good. i wondered why DSBT was written the way it was
(slightly different from FDPIC). the fact that it can work with the FDPIC
structure is awesome. i have no opinion on the backwards compat issue, but it
doesn't seem like it should be a problem as the official kernel hasn't
supported.
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]