From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26260 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2013 12:10:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 26240 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2013 12:10:33 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:10:32 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1V4ri3-0002w1-Rj from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 05:10:23 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-03.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.97.39]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:10:23 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-03.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.97.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 05:10:22 -0700 Message-ID: <51FA5007.7050601@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:10:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Muhammad Waqas , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH with testcase] Bug 11568 - delete thread-specific breakpoint on the thread exit References: <51F619CE.5040407@codesourcery.com> <51F633E5.7000302@codesourcery.com> <51F65519.2080806@codesourcery.com> <51F67992.30704@codesourcery.com> <51F7967E.3060900@codesourcery.com> <51F8791A.1090704@codesourcery.com> <51FA3D97.6040400@redhat.com> <51FA3F61.8040802@codesourcery.com> <51FA4619.8010006@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51FA4619.8010006@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 On 08/01/2013 07:27 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > Then it should explicitly test both modes. Say, move the body > to a procedure, and call it twice. Running the gdb.threads/ > tests with forced non-stop mode really makes no sense. OK, I am fine with it. Then, I withdraw my comment on adding a breakpoint command 'info threads' in the breakpoint on line 33. It is in this mail -- Yao (齐尧)