From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16705 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2013 19:21:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16696 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jul 2013 19:21:21 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:21:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6UJL6R4021631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:21:07 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6UJL5Bq008879; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:21:06 -0400 Message-ID: <51F81221.7000907@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:21:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Burgess CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Remove remaining uses of deprecated_throw_reason. References: <51F7E51E.3070807@broadcom.com> <51F7E5D3.5010300@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <51F7E5D3.5010300@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00793.txt.bz2 On 07/30/2013 05:12 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: > This removes the final uses of deprecated_throw_reason. In each case I've > replaced the use of deprecated_throw_reason with a call to quit. The only > change this will have is that the user will now see a "Quit" message, > however this seems pretty appropriate to me, what do you think? > > OK to apply? OK. -- Pedro Alves