From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30180 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2013 13:27:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 30154 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jul 2013 13:27:32 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:27:31 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-exc-10.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.58]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UyioE-0003kp-6L from Luis_Gustavo@mentor.com ; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:27:22 -0700 Received: from NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.181]) by SVR-ORW-EXC-10.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:27:22 -0700 Received: from [172.30.15.113] ([172.30.15.113]) by NA1-MAIL.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 15 Jul 2013 06:27:21 -0700 Message-ID: <51E3F8B3.10109@codesourcery.com> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:27:00 -0000 From: Luis Machado Reply-To: lgustavo@codesourcery.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Arnez CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [ping 2] [RFA][PATCH v4 0/5] Add TDB regset support References: <87zju3intq.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <87d2qt83au.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> <874nbwtdgk.fsf_-_@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <874nbwtdgk.fsf_-_@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00347.txt.bz2 Hi, On 07/15/2013 05:49 AM, Andreas Arnez wrote: > Did I miss anything, or is the patch set OK now? > > Andreas Arnez writes: > >> Is this good to go now? Any remaining concerns with the patch set? >> >> Andreas Arnez writes: >> >>> This is another iteration of GDB support for the "transaction diagnostic >>> block", TDB, which is provided by the transactional-execution facility >>> in newer z/Architecture systems. >>> >>> [...] > > > I didn't go through your last update of the patch, but FTR i still think we should make the core file sections static and store them in some form of array instead of hardcoding their contents in numerous function calls. Luis