From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13237 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2013 10:44:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13225 invoked by uid 89); 1 Jul 2013 10:44:43 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:44:43 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r61Aif8X019380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:44:42 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r61AieGr017978; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:44:41 -0400 Message-ID: <51D15D98.3050201@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:44:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergio Durigan Junior CC: Andreas Schwab , GDB Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] Implement gdbarch_gdb_signal_to_target References: <1372664545-3947-1-git-send-email-sergiodj@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 On 07/01/2013 11:40 AM, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> > There is also include/uapi/asm-generic/signal.h (which happens to agree >> > with x86 numbering) which will be used for every new architecture port. > Thanks for pointing that out. Could you update the comments in gdb/linux-tdep.c, etc. in that direction? No need to talk about x86 as some sort of template arch if going forward the kernel has a truly generic header. -- Pedro Alves