From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31209 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2013 10:57:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31196 invoked by uid 89); 26 Jun 2013 10:57:41 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:57:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5QAvchn027603 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:57:38 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5QAvaFq008092; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 06:57:37 -0400 Message-ID: <51CAC920.2080204@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:22:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yao Qi CC: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] New MI command -trace-frame-collected References: <1370610493-26468-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1371086914-8398-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1371086914-8398-6-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <83obbaw425.fsf@gnu.org> <51BAE445.5070300@codesourcery.com> <83vc5hug7e.fsf@gnu.org> <51BEE0F9.3090201@codesourcery.com> <831u80u52n.fsf@gnu.org> <51C0697A.2030604@codesourcery.com> <51C9D02B.7050202@redhat.com> <51CAA3FC.1060006@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <51CAA3FC.1060006@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00764.txt.bz2 On 06/26/2013 09:19 AM, Yao Qi wrote: >> "rest of the objects", or "the remaining objects" > > > I am not sure "The rest of objects" is wrong. I search "The rest of > objects" in google, and find a lot of usages. It may look like a lot in isolation, but google finds 89700 uses without "the" vs 51000000 (51M) with "the". It just looks like ~0.18% didn't know better to me. Anyway, "the remaining > objects" is fine to me, and I use it in the updated patch. Thanks. > Agreed. All your comments are addressed in the patch below, and the > patch is committed. Thanks again, -- Pedro Alves