From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5753 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2013 15:36:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5744 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jun 2013 15:36:51 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:36:50 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5LFalZd024495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:36:47 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5LFakcQ020124; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:36:46 -0400 Message-ID: <51C4730D.6050304@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:41:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger CC: Jan Kratochvil , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, "Metzger, Markus T" Subject: Re: Regression for btrace [Re: [PATCH v4] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations] References: <201305061451.24861.vapier@gentoo.org> <201306191829.07274.vapier@gentoo.org> <20130621111800.GA4552@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201306211134.00515.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201306211134.00515.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00594.txt.bz2 On 06/21/2013 04:33 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 21 June 2013 07:18:00 Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> OK to check in the fix this way? > > i like how it has simplified the code! lgtm (not that i'm an approver). FAOD, this is fine with me. Thanks, -- Pedro Alves