From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4388 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2013 14:58:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4375 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jun 2013 14:58:12 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:58:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5LEw87L002269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:58:08 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5LEw7Kt005231; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:58:07 -0400 Message-ID: <51C469FE.603@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:00:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" CC: Yao Qi , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] MIPS h/w watchpoint in GDBserver References: <1369881867-11372-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1369881867-11372-4-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <51B9468A.5070900@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00590.txt.bz2 (I found myself reading this again, ) On 06/19/2013 11:05 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: >> > + ** GDBserver now supports hardware watchpoint on mips GNU/Linux target. and noticed a typo here: s/watchpoint/watchpoints/ (I'd also suggest either "on the MIPS ... target", or on "MIPS ... targets"). -- Pedro Alves