From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Upload TSVs in extend-remote mode
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:36:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C34B4A.7000606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371636174-9822-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com>
On 06/19/2013 11:02 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> Hi,
> In extended-remote, when GDB connects the target, but target is not
> running, the TSVs are not uploaded (because remote_start_remote
> returns earlier when the reply to packet '?' is either 'X' or 'W').
>
> However, GDBserver has some builtin or predefined TSVs to upload, such
> as $trace_timestamp. This bug causes $trace_timestamp is never uploaded.
>
> The fix to this problem is to upload TSV in
> extended_remote_create_inferior_1.
This fixes "run", but I imagine it leaves "attach" broken?
> Another fix could be that move the code uploading TSVs earlier in
> remote_start_remote before sending packet '?'. I don't choose this
> approach because I'd like GDB to upload TSVs when inferior starts run,
> instead of when GDB connects to the stub.
Why would you like that? (Not saying it might not make sense).
>
> The patch to gdb.trace/tsv.exp can expose this bug by checking 'info
> tvariables' after connect to the remote. If only test part of this
> patch is applied, we can get a fail,
>
> $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=native-extended-gdbserver tsv.exp"
> FAIL: gdb.trace/tsv.exp: check uploaded tsv (pattern 1)
>
> With the whole patch applied, the fail goes away.
>
> I notice that TSV "$trace_timestamp" is not a documented TSV, so stubs
> other than GDBserver may not have it. If it is a concern, I am OK to
> drop the tsv.exp part from this patch.
I recently added some code in gdb.trace/qtro.exp that probes
for GDBserver:
# Check whether we're testing with our own GDBserver.
set is_gdbserver -1
set test "probe for GDBserver"
gdb_test_multiple "monitor help" $test {
-re "The following monitor commands are supported.*debug-hw-points.*remote-debug.*GDBserver.*$gdb_prompt $" {
set is_gdbserver 1
pass $test
}
-re "$gdb_prompt $" {
set is_gdbserver 0
pass $test
}
}
if { $is_gdbserver == -1 } {
return -1
}
(and I have a TODO item about adding a "monitor version"
command, which would be better than "monitor help").
We could move that to a shared is_gdbserver procedure in lib/,
and then:
if is_gdbserver then expect $trace_timestamp, otherwise, fail
else expect $trace_timestamp, but be graceful if it isn't supported.
That's similar to what qtro.exp is doing.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 10:40 Yao Qi
2013-06-20 18:36 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2013-06-22 11:23 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-24 15:50 ` Pedro Alves
2013-06-25 13:57 ` Yao Qi
2013-06-25 14:21 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C34B4A.7000606@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=yao@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox