From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20130 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2013 18:19:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20098 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jun 2013 18:19:20 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:19:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5IIJHp7011152 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:19:17 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5IIJGM0014752; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:19:16 -0400 Message-ID: <51C0A4A3.1000701@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:32:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Frysinger CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gdb: clean up x86 cpuid implementations References: <201305061451.24861.vapier@gentoo.org> <201306170205.26002.vapier@gentoo.org> <51BF4A24.3000503@redhat.com> <201306181352.59833.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201306181352.59833.vapier@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2 On 06/18/2013 06:52 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 17 June 2013 13:40:52 Pedro Alves wrote: >> On 06/17/2013 07:05 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> ping ... >> >> ... pong. >> >> ENOCHANGELOG > > i usually wait for the code to get reviewed before i waste time autogenerating > the ChangeLog entries. if people are happy with the code now, i can move on > to the last part before merging. Well, that's not the project's policy. ChangeLogs are supposed to be reviewed too. But let's stop this before it gets into a ChangeLog-are-useless argument... I know you write good ChangeLog entries. ;-) -- Pedro Alves