From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29235 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2013 16:09:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29202 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jun 2013 16:09:16 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:09:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5CG9DH6013239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:09:13 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5CG9BuR014607; Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:09:12 -0400 Message-ID: <51B89D27.7090503@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:47:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Kratochvil CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdbserver regression #2 [Re: [COMMIT PATCH][GDBserver] Multi-process + multi-arch] References: <20130530121335.15047.12654.stgit@brno.lan> <51B1BB04.9020304@redhat.com> <20130608015339.GA10329@host2.jankratochvil.net> <51B72C8E.8060905@redhat.com> <20130611143849.GA30462@host2.jankratochvil.net> <51B745F5.30604@redhat.com> <51B762BF.6040208@redhat.com> <20130612144845.GA23415@host2.jankratochvil.net> <51B88B4C.9050605@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51B88B4C.9050605@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 On 06/12/2013 03:53 PM, Pedro Alves wrote: > On 06/12/2013 03:48 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:47:43 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote: >>> Fixed now: >>> >>> >> >> So now there remains only a regression by the same patch: >> >> $ runtest-gdbserver gdb.base/siginfo-obj.exp gdb.base/siginfo-thread.exp gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp >> Running ./gdb.base/siginfo-thread.exp ... >> FAIL: gdb.base/siginfo-thread.exp: p ssi_addr >> Running ./gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp ... >> FAIL: gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp: signal 0 si_pid >> FAIL: gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp: signal 1 si_pid >> FAIL: gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp: signal 2 si_pid >> FAIL: gdb.threads/siginfo-threads.exp: signal 3 si_pid >> Running ./gdb.base/siginfo-obj.exp ... >> FAIL: gdb.base/siginfo-obj.exp: p ssi_addr >> FAIL: gdb.base/siginfo-obj.exp: p ssi_addr > > Thanks. Will fix. Done: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-06/msg00287.html I should definitely have caught this one in testing... Thanks, -- Pedro Alves