From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16275 invoked by alias); 29 May 2013 19:06:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 16258 invoked by uid 89); 29 May 2013 19:06:11 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 May 2013 19:06:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4TJ6934013535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:06:09 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4TJ68jW007267 for ; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:06:09 -0400 Message-ID: <51A651A0.9020503@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 19:06:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 6/7] Linker-debugger interface tests by Jan References: <20130516144847.GG2105@blade.nx> In-Reply-To: <20130516144847.GG2105@blade.nx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg01034.txt.bz2 On 05/16/2013 03:48 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > + Copyright 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Write "2011-2013". (I haven't checked all files, but there are more instances.) > +# With probes interface GDB no longer scans the inferior library list so its > +# corruption cannot be tested. There is no way to disable the probes > +# interface. I was wondering whether it wouldn't make sense to have such a way. It probably would be nice to run a couple dso related tests with the probes interface force-disabled (in addition with the probes enabled), at least for a couple years, while distros without probes are still relevant, so we can easily catch regressions. That could be done as a separate work, of course. -- Pedro Alves