On 05/15/2013 10:36 AM, Keith Seitz wrote:
> $ cat same.c
> int
> same (int a)
> {
>     return a;
> }
>
> int
> main (void)
> {
>    return same (0);
> }
> $ gcc -g same.c -o same
> $ gdb -q same
> (gdb) b same.\t\t
> [blah blah blah]
> c
> same
> (gdb)
>
> Compare this with unpatched gdb:
> (gdb) b same.\t\t
> [blah blah blah]
> same.c
> same
>
> So this needs to stay put. I'll see if I can generate a test case for this.

And here is the test case.

Keith

testsuite/ChangeLog
2013-05-15  Keith Seitz  <keiths@redhat.com>

	* gdb.base/filesym.exp: New completer test.
	* gdb.base/filesym.c: New file.