From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22434 invoked by alias); 10 May 2013 11:38:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22421 invoked by uid 89); 10 May 2013 11:38:05 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 May 2013 11:38:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4ABc1Yf010453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 May 2013 07:38:01 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r4ABbxOG016632; Fri, 10 May 2013 07:38:00 -0400 Message-ID: <518CDC17.2090107@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:38:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Taylor CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: ping References: <18001.1368126370@usendtaylorx2l> <518BF7D8.1070702@redhat.com> <18642.1368130153@usendtaylorx2l> In-Reply-To: <18642.1368130153@usendtaylorx2l> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-05/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2 On 05/09/2013 09:09 PM, David Taylor wrote: > Will someone please commit this patch? I got this. It'd be good to put this into 7.6 as well. I guess I'll be the lucky one who champions the "put 7.6.1 release notes in the wiki" process. I've filed PR15455 (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15455). I though it'd be best to come up with a test that helps makes sure QTro doesn't regress, so I wrote one. More after lunch. :-) -- Pedro Alves