From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4281 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2013 05:35:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4269 invoked by uid 89); 23 Apr 2013 05:35:29 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 05:35:18 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1UUVso-00065H-Vv from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:35:15 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:35:14 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:34:55 -0700 Message-ID: <51761D75.8020306@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:03:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hui Zhu CC: gdb-patches ml , Marc Khouzam Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bug 15181 Missing continue on dprintf that defaults to "gdb" style from "agent" References: <51748351.2030300@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00702.txt.bz2 On 04/23/2013 11:41 AM, Hui Zhu wrote: > The patch for remove "continue" is still in discussion, right? > Yes. > So I think the patch from Marc is more easy to handle 15181. And it > will not affect new patches. We need patch to fix problem if it is a bug. Whether PR 15181 is a bug or not depends on how PR 15075 is fixed. As I said, I suggest that we'd better fix PR 15075 first. If you insist, I don't mind. Other maintainers can review this patch. -- Yao (齐尧)