From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28095 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2013 16:14:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 28085 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2013 16:14:41 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:14:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3IGEdZS022341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:14:39 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3IGEbFS016636; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:14:38 -0400 Message-ID: <51701BED.1000704@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:28:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130311 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/26] serial_write: change prototype to take a void-pointer buffer. References: <20130411225847.16791.29283.stgit@brno.lan> <20130411230030.16791.28557.stgit@brno.lan> <5167DF5F.8060701@redhat.com> <516FD45D.3020209@redhat.com> <83d2tr3jyl.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83d2tr3jyl.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 On 04/18/2013 05:02 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Oops, sorry. I've seen this at the time, but didn't realize I needed > to approve it. No worries, I should have asked explicitly before. > Yes, OK, please go ahead. Thanks. -- Pedro Alves