From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20246 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2013 04:32:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20235 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2013 04:32:27 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 04:32:26 +0000 Received: from svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.98.93]) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1USgWG-00024J-MK from Yao_Qi@mentor.com ; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:32:24 -0700 Received: from SVR-ORW-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com ([147.34.96.206]) by svr-orw-fem-01.mgc.mentorg.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:32:24 -0700 Received: from qiyao.dyndns.org (147.34.91.1) by svr-orw-fem-02.mgc.mentorg.com (147.34.96.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.247.3; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:32:23 -0700 Message-ID: <516F775C.9060201@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:14:00 -0000 From: Yao Qi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Alves CC: Subject: Re: [ping 2]: [PATCH v4 0/5] MI notification on trace started/stopped References: <1358838232-13319-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <1364869917-12803-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <5164D38C.8070003@codesourcery.com> <516E3ED7.5080204@codesourcery.com> <516F3C05.2030603@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <516F3C05.2030603@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00560.txt.bz2 On 04/18/2013 08:19 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > I do my best to review as much as possible. In fact, my main Pedro, I appreciate your reviews and comments greatly. They are very helpful. > projects keep getting delayed for months as I can't ever find enough time/energy > to focus on them. Unfortunately it tends to happen that I end up needing to > spend a very significant amount of time and energy through the patches/proposals. I fully agree with you that patch review is quite time-consuming. > The past weeks were a set back, as as you know, 7.6 had issues that needed > addressing. It'd be great if patches/designs and submissions come up perfect > from the get go, or that I was smarter and could review faster, but that's > unfortunately not frequently the case. The bigger the patch/series, the more > likely it is that it needs iteration. I know you have several series waiting to The V3 of this series was posted in Jan 22th, and there was no review on non-doc part since then. I kept doing self-review and resolving conflicts against trunk, to facilitate reviewers to review. There was no response, unfortunately. -- Yao (齐尧)